William Deering & Co. v. Russell
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Ransom County; Lauder, J. Action by William Deering & Co., a corporation, against R. R. Russell and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants Aylen and Labbitt appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.
The plaintiff is a corporation "engaged in manufacturing and selling machinery and supplies, with its home office at Chicago, 111. In 1893 the defendant Russell was the agent for plaintiff at Sheldon and Enderlin, in this state. The other defendants were guarantors of the due fulfillment of the agency contract. On the settlement of the business for that year between the principal and agent, it was found that Russell had received property belonging to plaintiff, amounting to $2,325.64, for which he had not accounted. A large part of the deficiency was on twine account. This action was brought…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bingham v. MearsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Laura v. Crane Bros. Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Forbes v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. KramlichIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Bank of Conway v. StaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Hovsepian v. EskenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. KramlichIdaho Supreme Court · 1928