Legal Opinion

Anderson v. . Read

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1887PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made March 21, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. This action was brought by plaintiff, as assignee fo/ the benefit of creditors of one P. M. De Leon, to recover damages for the non-delivery of the goods mentioned in the instrument set forth in the opinion, wherein, also, all the material facts are stated.

1Opinion of the CourtPeckham, J.

Prior to and at the time of the transactions in question in this action, the firm of Rasin & Co. was engaged in business in the city of Baltimore as manufacturers and sellers of fertilizers, and the defendants as partners, and one Perry M. De Leon, individually, were engaged in the same business in the city of ETew York. On or about the 7th day of December, 1881, one of the members of the defendants’ firm and an agent or member of the firm of Rasin & Co., met in the city of Atlanta, in the State of Georgia, and signed a contract, of which what follows is a copy :

“ Markham House, l
“W. A. Huee,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Kimberly v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Russell v. NicollNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Briggs v. . SizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Walti v. GabaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Clements v. Jackson County Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API