De Conick v. De Conick
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by John De Conick against Edward De Conick and others to set aside a deed. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The complainant and defendant Edward De Conick are sons of Johanna De Conick, deceased. Jennie is the wife of Edward De Conick, while Mary Nagle is a niece of Johanna De Conick, who has lived in the families of Johanna and Edward nearly all of the time since she was 11 or 12 years of age. Johanna De Conick was the owner of two parcels of land, one an 80-acre parcel, a part of the homestead, the other a 20-acre parcel, in or near Detroit. Edward De Conick has always lived with his mother, and, since John left home at the age of 23, has worked the farm. On May 28, 1894, Johanna causedher…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Markham v. HuffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Leonard v. LeonardMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- Rapid Railway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Scott v. RoethlisbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Moore v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1936