Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. Greenway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1926No. 19981. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants in an action seeking to have a certain deed, absolute in form, declared to be a mortgage in fact.

The assignments of error raise only one question : Was the evidence sufficient to establish the fact that the deed was in reality a mortgage. The salient parts of the evidence are briefly as follows:

The appellant, a lawyer by profession, but engaged in the real estate business in Seattle, formulated a plan whereby the owner of several residence properties in that city could buy the Carolina Courts which were then for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Dempsey v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Kegley v. SkillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Nutter v. Cowley Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Washington Save Deposit & Trust Co. v. LietzowWashington Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cannon v. Seattle Title Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Big Bend Milling Co. v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API