Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Storozhenko

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 16, 2011No. 19-42750PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION REGARDING DEBTOR’S “MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY”

THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This opinion concerns the scope of the “criminal action or proceeding” exception to the automatic stay, contained in 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(1). The case came before the Court for hearing on August 24, 2011 on two motions. This opinion concerns one of those motions, namely the Debtor’s motion entitled “Motion for Sanctions for Violation of the Automatic Stay” (Docket # 28, the “Motion”). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant this Motion in part, and deny it in part.

I.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re CrippsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. In re BazziUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  3. In re ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  4. Branch v. 30th District Court City of Highland Park (In re Branch)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  5. Moss v. Sallie Mae, Inc. Ex Rel. USA Funding (In Re Moss)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API