Legal Opinion

In re Thompson

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 9, 2017No. Case No. 16-54628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

C. Kathryn Preston, United States Bankruptcy Judge

This cause came on for hearing on November 18, 2016 (the “Stay Hearing”), upon the Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay (Doc. #29) (the “Motion”), filed by Natures Products, Inc. (“Creditor”), and the objection to the Motion (Doc. #35) (the “Objection”) and supplemental memorandum thereto (Doc. #46) (the “Supplement”), filed by Nathanael M. Thompson and Jennifer B. Thompson (collectively, “Debtors”), on October 18, 2016, and November 14, 2016, respectively. Creditor filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Roe v. Operation RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Martha R. KaveCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Bayshore Associates, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wohleber v. Skurko (In re Wohleber)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. In re Lawrence Wohleber, Jr.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API