Legal Opinion

Rosencrans v. Territory of Washington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1890No. 39PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to District Court, Pierce County. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AkdeRS, O. J.

This case is sui generis. It appears from the record that some time prior to October 10, 1888, the-plaintiff in error being the owner of certain premises known as Number 1130 0 street, in the city of Tacoma, in Pierce county, leased the same to one Nettie Parnell, who, on said date, was indicted for maintaining a nuisance on the premises by keeping a hou <e of ill-fame. To this indictment the defendant, Nettie Parnell, pleaded guilty, and thereafter on the 19th day of October, 1888, an order was made by the court, directed to the sheriff…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Ingersoll v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Beck v. KnabbTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity · 1804
  4. Chambers v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1802
  5. Eliza C. Perkins v. Joshua HadleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1817

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API