Malone v. Horowitz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
Annie M. Malone, doing business under the style and name of Poro College, of St. Louis, Mo., filed opposition proceedings in the Patent Office against the issuance of a trade-mark to Morris Max Horowitz. Prom concurring decisions by the Examiner of Interferences and the Commissioner of Patents, dismissing the opposition and adjudging the applicant entitled to registration, the opposer, appellant, has appealed to this court.
The mark sought to be registered by Horowitz consists of the word “Molo” to be applied, according to the substitute statement and declaration of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Kassman & Kessner, Inc. v. Rosenberg Bros.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bon Ami Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Johnson & Johnson v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- National Biscuit Co. v. SheridanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.