Legal Opinion

Scott v. Foodarama Supermarkets

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 27, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

942 A.2d 107 (2008)

398 N.J. Super. 441

Dale SCOTT, Petitioner-Respondent,

v.

FOODARAMA SUPERMARKETS, Respondent-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 7, 2008.

Decided February 27, 2008.

Richard J. Williams, Jr., Morristown, argued the cause for appellant (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, attorneys; Michael J. Marone, of counsel; Mr. Williams, on the brief).

Michael D. Kirby, Toms River, argued the cause for respondent (Rosenberg, Kirby, Cahill & Stankowitz, attorneys; Derek L. Richardson, on the brief).

Before Judges COLLESTER, C.S. FISHER[1] and C.L.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Lemke v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Hammond v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. De Angelo v. Alsan Masons Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAMUEL KAMENETTI VS. SANGILLO & SONS, LLC (DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API