Legal Opinion
Horstman v. Bowermaster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 17, 1923No. 14152PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
Plaintiff in error commenced this action against defendant in error on May 18, 1922. On July 15, 1922, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the case for the reason that the matters involved in plaintiff’s petition had become res judicata by reason of the judgment entered on May 18,' 1922, in case No. 8083, the same being an action between the same parties and in the same court. The evidence was taken on this motion, and judgment entered dismissing the case with prejudice, from which plaintiff in error has prosecuted this appeal.
A motion to dismiss is not the proper mode of raising…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Brown v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Stauffer v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Gibson v. DizneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Howard v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Henderson v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Jarrett v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Exendine v. IronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.