Kornegay v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
The appellant was tried and convicted on an indictment charging carnal knowledge of a girl under twelve years of age.
We are urged to reverse the judgment of the court below despite the fact that the record presents no questions for our review. The proceedings in the circuit court were in every respect regular. The general affirmative charge in appellant’s behalf was not tendered. A motion for a new trial was na», filed. A few objections were interposed relating to the introduction of the evidence. In each instance, when the ruling was adverse to the accused, no exceptions were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kelley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
- Lipscomb v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Johnson v. City of JasperAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Fendley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Commons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fendley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951