Legal Opinion

Matter of Conway

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

107 N.J. 168 (1987)

526 A.2d 658

IN THE MATTER OF DONALD R. CONWAY, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 23, 1986.

Decided June 10, 1987.

Thomas J. McCormick, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Justin P. Walder argued the cause for respondent (Walder, Sondak, Berkeley & Brogan, attorneys; Justin P. Walder, Dominic J. Aprile and John A. Brogan, on the brief).

2Per curiam

This attorney-disciplinary case is before us upon the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board), determining that respondent, Donald…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. In Re HindsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API