Legal Opinion

Wyoming Wool Marketing Association v. Urruty

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1964No. 3218-3221PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

The question involved on this appeal taken by Wyoming Wool Marketing Association in Case No. 3218 is whether or not the action here was prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest as required by Rule 17(a), Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure. Under the circumstances it is unnecessary extensively to relate the facts or the contents of the pleadings. In a general way, however, the record shows that on January 13, 1951, defendant Martin Urruty entered into a marketing agreement with Wyoming Cooperative Wool Marketing Association, predecessor in interest to plaintiff Wyoming Wool Marketing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gardner v. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dunham v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Sun Land & Cattle Co. v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mitter v. Black Diamond Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greenough v. Prairie Dog Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. "Laramie Citizens for Good Government" v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Barbour v. BarbourWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Central Wyoming Medical Laboratory, LLC v. Medical Testing Lab, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API