Grosz v. Groth
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This litigation arose out of a collision of motor vehicles at an intersection of country roads. Under instructions not presented for review, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Predicated upon a motion for a directed verdict, and a subsequent motion for judgment n. o. v., the trial court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed. The ultimate question for decision is whether the manifest negligence of plaintiff was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm he 'suffered.
Plaintiff was driving north on a through highway protected from cross traffic by stop signs. Cf.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKiver v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Kundert v. B. F. Goodrich Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Robertson v. HennrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Campbell v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Alborn v. ArmsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carpenter v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Davis v. KnipplingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Roth v. JeldenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Hullander v. McIntyreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Ricketts v. TusaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.