Legal Opinion
Sessa v. MacOmb County
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1997No. Docket 192569PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.
Plaintiffs are Macomb County taxpayers1 who invoke this Court’s original jurisdiction pursuant *282to Const 1963, art 9, § 32, and challenge the action of defendants in issuing limited tax obligation bonds to finance construction of a court and administrative complex for Macomb County at its county seat in Mt. Clemens.
FACTS
Over the past eight years, the Macomb County Board of Commissioners planned for the construction of a court and administrative complex to be located in downtown Mt. Clemens. The land for the project was acquired, and demolition of certain structures was completed by 1994. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Keefe v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1986 Pa 281Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1976 PA 295, 1976 PA 297Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Smith v. Scio TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bylinski v. City of Allen ParkDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997