Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bolt v. City of Lansing

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1997No. Docket 192944Published

1DissentMarkman, J.

I respectfully dissent. The people of the State of Michigan presumably enacted the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25-34, because they believed their liberties were as much threatened by governmental spending and taxing decisions as they were by governmental decisions concerning other subjects addressed in the Michigan Constitution, such as the regulation of speech, Const 1963, art 1, § 5, and the treatment of criminal suspects, Const 1963, art 1, § 20. Section 31 of the Headlee Amendment states in relevant part:

Units of Local Government are hereby prohibited from levying any tax not…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API