Legal Opinion

State v. Murrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 2017No. 233PA16PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Justice.

**188The issue before us in this case is whether an indictment returned for the purpose of charging defendant with the offense of robbery with a dangerous weapon sufficed to give the trial court jurisdiction to enter judgment against defendant based upon his conviction for having committed that offense. After careful consideration of the record in light of the applicable law, we hold that the challenged indictment was fatally defective because it did not sufficiently allege all of the essential elements of the offense of robbery with a dangerous weapon and, for that reason,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. RankinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. EverretteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. State v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  5. State v. OldroydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API