Legal Opinion

Coppel v. Riggins

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 8, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00674Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND LAWRENCE D. COPPEL, * Litigation Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Linowes and Blocher LLP * Plaintiff , * v. * Civil Action No. RDB-23-0674 WILLIAM W. RIGGINS, III, * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Lawrence D. Coppel is a court-appointed Litigation Assignee for the benefit of creditors of Linowes & Blocher LLP (L&B), a now-defunct law firm. He has brought this suit under diversity jurisdiction to recover transfers that were made to Defendant William W. Riggins, III, a former member of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API