Legal Opinion

Smith v. Holden

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1897No. 10140PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. Hon. Z. T, Hazen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

The defendants offered for probate, as the will of Sarah A. Smith, deceased, the following instrument:

“It is my desire that the amounts herein below shall be distributed as follows : Of the moneys now in the hands of W. A. L. Thompson Hardware Company, of Topeka, Kan., Mrs. Emma Holden, for the use of her son Kenneth, eight hundred dollars ($800), and to Richard L. Holden fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) ; payable to R. L. Holden, July 1, and Emma, November 1, 1889. And, further, that Sallie M. Merritt, Lizzie H. Latham, Nannie B. Battey, Ida M. Holden and Ida S. Thompson shall pay Richard L.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clarke v. RansomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Stout v. TownsendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. President of the Manhattan Co. v. ArmourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Postlethwaite v. EdsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Springer v. SchnackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Matter of Estate of KalouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Hoover v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API