(PS) Green v. The John Stewart Company
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VIRGINIA SUE GREEN, No. 2:24-cv-0378 DJC SCR PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned by operation of Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 Plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. 21 However, the application is largely incomplete and does not provide the information necessary 22 for the Court to make a determination. See 28…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. HalleckSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.