Legal Opinion · Dissent

Franklyn S., Inc. v. Riesenbeck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1964No. 63-853Published

1DissentBarkdull, Chief Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this cause. The issue before this court is whether the chancellor erred in quashing a subpoena duces tecum directed to a party, which attempted to require the production of documents at a trial. The record reveals that the party who served the subpoena duces tecum waited until the eve of the final hearing to file a subpoena duces tecum addressed to the adverse party requiring the production of the following items: (1) All account books of Thurman A. Whiteside including his attorney at law account, personal accounts, all trust accounts,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metz v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Olin's Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Avis Rental Car System of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Therrell v. HowlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Biscayne Trust Co. v. O'FerrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. McKinley v. ArpinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API