Legal Opinion

Drummy v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, Palo Alto District Court. — Hon. D. E. Coyle, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries due to tbe negligence of the defendant, received by plaintiff while sustaining toward defendant the relation of passenger. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and from judgment in her favor the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The plaintiff with her husband, traveling from the city of Bed Wing, Minn.,. to their home in Emmetsburg, arrived in Waterville, Minn., on the line of the Great Western Bailroad about nine o’clock in the evening, with the intention of taking one of the night trains on the defendant’s road from Waterville to Emmetsburg. It appeared that two trains were available to them; one leaving Waterville at 9:52, the other at 10:15. Plaintiff and her husband went from the Great Western station to a hotel for supper, and, leaving the hotel ■ some time after nine o’clock, went to the station of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Shaber v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. McKone v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Buenemann v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. TreadwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Town of Andover v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API