Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Itasca Cotton Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1950No. Nos. 12731, 12897, 12899 12901PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Submitted together upon stipulations that the facts in the other cases were the same as those in the Itasca case,1 these petitions for enforcement of orders entered by the Board present a single question, whether Sec. 10(b) 2 of the National Labor Rela*506tions Act, as amended by “Labor Management Relations Act 1947”, operated to bar the proceedings taken by and before the Board.
These are the facts on which the decision in the Itasca case, and, therefore, by stipulation in the others, turns:
Based upon an unfair labor practice occurring on December 17, 1945, a charge was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Joanna Cotton Mills Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. MorenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McCloskey & Co. v. EckartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Boston v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Itasca Cotton Mfg. Co. National Labor Relations Board v. Hicks-Hayward Co. National Labor Relations Board v. Hillsboro Cotton Mills. National Labor Relations Board v. Vanette Hosiery MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950