Legal Opinion

McQuillen v. Dillon

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 25, 1938No. 228PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

There can be no doubt that the Maryland decree so far as it purported to cancel the interest of Dillon, Read & Co. in certain shares of stock of National Cash Register Company on the theory that they were unlawfully issued would necessarily rest upon proof that the shares were owned by Dillon, Read & Co. at the time of the commencement of suit. There was no such allegation in this or the Maryland bill. The plaintiffs’ allegations arq entirely vague and uncertain as to whether the stock interest was retained down to the time of bringing suit. The confused…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Grable v. KillitsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hodson v. Hodson Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  2. Hodson v. Hodson Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  3. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  4. Hoxsey v. HoffpauirCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API