Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Jordan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1925No. 18562. En BancPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The appellant was found guilty of the alleged crime of disorderly conduct, in violation of ordinance No. 16,046, §§ 1 and 61, of the city of Seattle. From the judgment and sentence upon the verdict, this appeal is taken.

The provisions of the ordinance in question provide as follows:

“Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person to be guilty of fighting, drunkenness or of riotous or disorderly conduct, or of conduct tending to disturb the public peace, or to use any profane or abusive lan guage, or to engage in any act or practice whereby the peace or quiet of the city may be disturbed, or to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blanton v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. BodeckarWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. KoernerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. City of Huntington v. PeaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HoltWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Auburn v. BrookeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. NonogWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Seattle v. MorrowWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API