In re Morgantown Tin Plate Co.
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
In tlie matter of bankruptcy proceedings of the Morgantown Tin Plate Company. On petition to review a referee’s order allowing claims of George C. Sturgiss and Morgantown & Kingwood Railroad Company and by Sturgiss as assignee of George j. Humbird.
1Opinion of the Court
DAYTON, District Judge.
The litigation, involving the affairs of this ¡bankrupt, commenced before I assumed the bench, in this bankruptcy proceeding and in the equity cause of the Canton Roll & Machine Company v.. Rolling Mill Company of America, has already been the subject of one opinion by myself and of two by the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit, from which the material facts can be obtained. Sturgiss v. Corbin, 141 Fed. 1, 72 C. C. A. 179; Canton Roll & Mach. Co. v. Rolling Mill Co. (C. C.) 155 Fed. 321; Canton Roll & Mach. Co. v. Rolling Mill Co., 168 Fed. 465, 93 C. C. A. 621.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Merriam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Watchorn v. Roxana Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Beattie v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Johnson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Patterson v. Alabama Vermiculite Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957