Legal Opinion
Gregg v. American Quasar Petroleum Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 29, 1993No. Civ. A. 88 N 9PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a former employee of American Quasar Petroleum Company of New Mexico. He claims that defendants, American Quasar Petroleum Company of New Mexico and others, did not pay the correct amount due him under defendants’ oil finding bonus plan. Plaintiff claims that a greater quantity of proved oil and gas reserves should have been included in the figures used to determine his bonus payments and that, as a result of these incomplete determinations, plaintiff received inadequate bonuses.
The matter is now before me on defendants’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wendy's International, Inc. v. Nu-Cape Construction, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Grant v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Knish v. StineDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- Linda Young v. Cobe Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.