Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Hardy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1991No. 223A90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Helen Barnes was injured in a collision with the insured defendants Hardy. Plaintiffs filed suit and defendant insurer, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“USF&G”), offered $49,900 in settlement. The liability limit on the policy was $50,000, and coverage included “all defense costs we incur.”

Plaintiffs eventually accepted $50,000 from defendant insurer, but the parties could not agree on whether USF&G was responsible for prejudgment interest in excess of its liability limits. They submitted to a declaratory judgment action in which the trial court held…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Lowe v. TarbleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Collins v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Collins v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API