Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 10, 2004No. 2003-534-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

An insurer issued an automobile-liability insurance policy in Massachusetts to a Massachusetts resident for a Massachusetts-registered car. The policy excluded coverage for accidents occurring outside Massachusetts. After the insured’s vehicle was involved in a Rhode Island accident, a Superior Court motion justice declared that the above-described geographic limitation on coverage violated Rhode Island public policy and, thus, was unenforceable. Because Rhode Island law does not conflict with this provision, see Mendez v. Brites, No.2001-230-A, 849 A.2d 329, 2004 WL 1219330 (R.I.,…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Lending Corp. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  2. Russell v. KalianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Nichola v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Goodman v. TurnerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  5. Allstate Insurance v. SullamNew York Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christy's Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Massachusetts Homeland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  2. Amron Family Fun Fare v. T.H.E. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Berrios v. Jevic TransportationSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. In re 38 Studios Grand JurySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020
  5. In re 38 Studios Grand JurySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API