Lund v. Gray Line Water Tours, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Respondents initiated this class action against appellant to have it vacate a dock in the Ashley River in Charleston. Upon referral, the master found the respondents were entitled to relief and recommended that the appellant be ordered to vacate the premises. Appellant excepted to the Master’s Report. After considering the appellant’s exceptions, the trial court adopted the Master’s Report in its entirety. Appellant alleges the master and the trial court erred in granting respondents’ relief. We affirm in part and modify in part.
Respondents represent themselves and other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Stewart-Jones Co. v. ShehanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Frady v. IvesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Peddler, Inc. v. RikardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Moody v. StemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harmon v. Bank of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Moore v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Rufus Rivers v. James Smith, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2025