Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Fisk Rubber Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff from being run over by an automobile, owned and operated by the defendant, while they were concurrently using a public way.* In the Superior Court at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, a verdict was ordered† for the defendant, and the case is here on exceptions.

It is the defendant’s contention, that there was no evidence of the plaintiff’s due care or of the defendant’s negligence. The plaintiff was employed by marketmen to deliver goods to their customers, which he carried in bundles either on his shoulders or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Murphy v. Armstrong Transfer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Donovan v. BernhardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Winckowski v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brown v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Hillebrant v. ManzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Aiken v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API