Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Stuard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1924No. 10636. [fn*]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

By their amended petition, filed May 81, 1922, plaintiffs, R. C. Stuard and wife, C. U. Stuard, alleged: That on October 26, 1917; they executed and delivered to appellants an oil and gas lease on 56 acres of land, out of the Blundell survey in Eastland county, for a consideration of $456 in cash and that drilling preparations be begun on said premises within 60 days from the date- of the lease. That in connection with and contemporaneous with the making of said lease, and as a further consideration for the signing of the same, W. K. Gordon, acting for appellant, verbally agreed to drill and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. J. M. Guffey Petroleum Co. v. Jeff Chaison Townsite Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Mid-Texas Petroleum Co. v. ColcordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. StuardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Cosden Oil Co. v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Texas Co. v. RamsowerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API