Legal Opinion
Philco Corp. v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1969No. Docket 5,535PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
Philco Corporation made arrangements to purchase sophisticated electronic equip ment from Apex Computer Products Co. of California. The equipment included certain “memory cores” which are extremely intricate units of electrical apparatus and are valued at about $140,000 each. Because of their unique component parts, these memory cores cannot be transported or handled in any position except upright.
Philco engaged The Flying Tiger Line to transport the memory units from Culver City, California, to Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, by air freight. Philco claims that it expressly pointed out that it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- TI ME Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Jones v. the Flying ClipperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Hewitt-Robins, Incorporated v. Eastern Freight-Ways, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Praxair, Inc. v. Mayflower Transit Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Information Control Corp. v. United Airlines Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hill Construction Corp. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Seetapun v. Illinois-California Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Bianchi v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.