Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bogrette v. Young

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1984No. Docket No. 68241Published

1DissentW. R. Peterson, J.

"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute” is easily said when the defense can be financed with funds legally owing for tribute (or restitution). I would affirm the trial judge, his ruling on the claim for attorney fees being mandated by his findings in the case in chief which resulted in dissolution of the defendant corporation. Those findings are substantiated by the evidence and have withstood the efforts of counsel to overturn the judgment on appeal.

*438Now appellant attorneys contend that their unsuccessful efforts to overturn the judgment should be financed from the corporate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sant v. Perronville Shingle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Watson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Witherspoon v. HornbeinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Esarey v. Pierson, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API