Legal Opinion

United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFK1ND, District Judge.

This is a civil action by the United States under the provisions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. The two corporate defendants are Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., a manufacturer of opthalmic goods and Soft-Lite Lens Co., Inc., a distributor of unpatented, pink tinted lenses, under the trademark “Soft-Lite”, for use in spectacles and eye glasses. The individual defendants are officers of one or the other corporation.

The complaint charges the defendants with violations of sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 3, by unlawfully…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Packard Motor Car Company v. The Webster Motor Car Company, the Webster Motor Car Company v. Packard Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Columbia Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API