Stokes v. Stokes
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINO WITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. COMPTON, Justice.
This appeal raises the question whether the superior court erred by dismissing an action for divorce and child custody on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA or “Act”), AS 25.30.010-.900. We conclude that the superior court properly dismissed the issue of child custody. However, the case should have proceeded on the issue of divorce. Therefore, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Suzan Stokes and Jeffery Stokes were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kennecorp Mortgage & Equities, Inc. v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Foster v. FosterAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Szmyd v. SzmydAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. ZacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Mondy v. MondySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Pike v. AignerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992