Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brookline Savings & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 26, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

We adopt the following statement of the case on appeal from the appellant’s brief:

“This suit was filed by the Complainant to secure a perpetual injunction against the Brookline Savings and Trust Company from further prosecuting a suit at law in Johnson City, Tennessee, under the style of Brookline Savings and Trust Company v. Sam Taylor, et ux, and a decree declaring the note void and uncollectible. Tr. pp. 4-6.

The original bill alleges:(a) That the Complainants never signed the note sued on in the court at Johnson City.(b) That the Complainants were misinformed by agents of the American…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Englewood State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Hannen v. Peoples State BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Woodard v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  4. Commercial Credit Corporation v. FreilerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API