Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Bruce

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 26, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarney, J.

The Chancellor sustained the original bill filed by the complainant below, Edna "Woodard, in which, she sought cancellation of a $3,500 note and deed of trust on her home and an injunction against foreclosure under said trust, on the grounds of fraud.

The defendant, Floyd Bruce, is a contractor who did certain repairs on the house and lot of Edna Woodard for which she executed and delivered to him her promissory note in the amount of $3,500 drawing interest at 6% per annum payable at $35 per month and secured by a deed of trust on her house and lot in Memphis, Tennessee. Defendant Godwin, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stephens v. OzbourneTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Richardson v. McGeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Providence A.M.E. Church v. SauerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gill v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
  2. Tennessee Real Estate Commission v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  3. Cumberland Properties, LLC v. Ravenwood Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  4. Taylor v. Brookline Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API