City of Santa Rosa v. Patel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIVERA, J.
These appeals, consolidated on this court’s motion, follow the trial court’s entry of an order awarding the City of Santa Rosa and the People of the State of California (collectively, the City) attorney fees in this red light abatement action. In appeal No. A124199, the City contends that the court erred in using a cost-plus approach rather than the lodestar method in calculating the amount of the attorney fees award. In appeal No. A124452, the Patels1 argue that the court erred in awarding fees because the City lacked standing to pursue the underlying action and that, in any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Meister v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SchlimbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011