Legal Opinion

City of Santa Rosa v. Patel

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 2010No. A124199; No. A124452PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RIVERA, J.

These appeals, consolidated on this court’s motion, follow the trial court’s entry of an order awarding the City of Santa Rosa and the People of the State of California (collectively, the City) attorney fees in this red light abatement action. In appeal No. A124199, the City contends that the court erred in using a cost-plus approach rather than the lodestar method in calculating the amount of the attorney fees award. In appeal No. A124452, the Patels1 argue that the court erred in awarding fees because the City lacked standing to pursue the underlying action and that, in any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Meister v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SchlimbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API