Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Bettman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1898PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Tyler County. Action by W. H. Roberts against M. A. and D. Bettman on covenants in a lease. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, President:

Roberts made two leases of two tracts of land to Boyle for oil and gas purposes, by which Boyle agreed to pay a certain share of oil for oil wells, and a certain money rent for gas wells, should producing wells be bored. The leases contained the clauses: “It is agreed that the party of the second part shall pay to the party of the first part $100 per month in advance until a well is completed from the date of this lease, and a failure to complete such well, or to pay said rental when due, or within ten days thereafter, shall render this lease null and void, and can only be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wills v. Manufacturers N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. McMillan v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Cochran v. PewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Galey Bros. v. KellermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Leatherman v. OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Eclipse Oil Co. v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. PendarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Cohn v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. McDaniel v. Hager-Stevenson Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API