Legal Opinion

Iozzi v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 18, 1968No. 63, September Term, 1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was found guilty of extortion 1 by a jury in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 4 years.

On appeal from the judgment the appellant contends:

I. The statute proscribing the offense of which he was convicted is unconstitutional as vague and indefinite.

II. The trial court erred in certain instructions to the jury.

III. The evidence was not sufficient to sustain the conviction.

I

The question of the constitutionality of the statute proscribing the offense of which the appellant was charged and convicted was not presented to the lower court and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Royal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Woodell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Graef v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Tillery v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vuitch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Isaacs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Mason v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n v. BreslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Law v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API