Legal Opinion
Goodson v. Pope
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 2, 1965No. 41246PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge'.
“The remedy afforded by the statute'for the processioning of land . . . [Code Ch. 85-16] is applicable only to the location of land lines which once were marked or established. It is not available as a proceeding to make and establish new lines between adjacent landowners, nor as a substitute for an action to try conflicting claims of title to land.” Wheeler v. Thomas, 139 Ga. 598 (77 SE 817).
“Processioners determine the location of lines as they actually exist, and not lines as they ought to be, in view of the title of the parties. They do not determine title. See Boyce v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Bowen v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Miller & Co. v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Boyce v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Wheeler v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. Rome Kraft CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Mullis v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Minor v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Allen v. Rome Kraft CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Fulford v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966