Legal Opinion
Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Vladeck
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 7, 1996No. Civil 3-96-63PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of certain exemptions for Christian Science sanitoria under Medicare and Medicaid, claiming that Congress’ creation of such exemptions violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, and both Defendants and Defendant-Intervenor The First Church of Christ, Scientist (“the Church”) have submitted Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Cross-Motions brought by Defendants and the Church will be…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, Inc. v. Min De ParleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Tayag v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Young Advocates for Fair Educ. v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Kong v. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Hatch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.