D'Avanzo v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Andrew M. and Linda J. D’Avanzo are plaintiffs in this tax refund case that is before the Court after trial held on August 13 and November 5, 2004. United States Court of Federal Claims Rule (“RCFC”) 52(a) governs “actions tried upon the facts,” and provides that findings of fact may be “based on oral or documentary evidence ... and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of [sic] the credibility of the witness.” RCFC 52(a). The Court heard testimony from plaintiff1 Andrew D’Avanzo and received affidavits from Sylvia…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gizzi v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Sara Lee Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Blackburn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Goshorn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Perez v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- Dean v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dean v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- O'Connell v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011