Hazlehurst v. Seaboard Air-line Railway
Supreme Court of Georgia
Attachment. Before Judge Eelton. City court of Macon. March 9, 1903.
1Opinion of the CourtLamar, J.
The plaintiff brought suit by attachment against the Seabroad Air-Line Railway as a non-resident corporation, making the same returnable to the city court of Macon. The declaration on the attachment claimed damages for the breach of a contract to ship a car-load of frtiit from Richland, in Stewart county, to Toronto, Canada. The defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction, on the ground that under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 2334, the suit could only be maintained in Stewart county, where the cause of action arose. The plaintiff insists that this section applies to causes of action in…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. GrizzleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Coakley v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Lytle v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Bracewell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Mitchell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.