Legal Opinion

Golding v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1923No. 14139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for arson; from Brooks superior court — Judge Thomas. November 16, 1922. Application for certiorari was denied by th° Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bloodworth, ' J.

Jim and Charley Lewis were indicted for

arson, and Sam Golding, Lorena Golding, and Turner Hollis for being accessories before the fact to the same offense. The Goldings demurred to the indictment, their demurrer was overruled, and they excepted. The indictment is as follows: “ The grand jurors [named] charge and accuse Jim Lewis and Charley Lewis with the offense of arson, and Sam Golding, Lorena Golding, and Turner Hollis with the offense of accessory before the fact of said arson; for that the said Jim Lewis and Charley Lewis, on the 5th day of July in the year 1922, in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tukes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Usher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API