Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State, Department of Health v. Mill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 19, 1994No. 93SC418Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Erickson

specially concurring:

We granted certiorari to review both the regulatory taking and eminent domain rulings in The Mill v. State of Colorado, Department of Health, 868 P.2d 1099 (Colo.App.1993).14 I agree with the majority that the court of appeals erred in finding a regulatory taking of The Mill’s property. I also agree that the enhanced value statute, section 24-56 — 117(l)(c), 10B C.R.S. (1988), is dispositive in this case in determining whether the decontaminated value of a property should be considered for purposes of eminent domain pursuant to the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Williams v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Mulford v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. State, Department of Health v. the MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Department of Health v. Hecla Mining Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API