Joshua Deatrick v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Joshua Deatrick appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Deatrick argues that his sentence pursuant to the Michigan sentencing scheme is unconstitutional because the state trial court found facts that increased his minimum sentence, in violation of the Apprendi/Blakely/Booker line of eases. Deatrick further argues that this Court must reconsider previous panel decisions upholding the Michigan sentencing scheme in light of the Supreme Court decisions United States v. O’Brien and Cunningham v. California, infra.
We AFFIRM.
I
In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sykes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Castillo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Craig Haskell v. Mary BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Craig Haskell v. Mary BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Gonyea v. TerrisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019