Legal Opinion
Paul v. Weiss
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Pennock, J.
The plaintiff makes this motion for
summary judgment in lieu of a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213. The plaintiff served a summons with a notice of motion for summary judgment with a supporting affidavit. It was returnable 20 days after service. This was all done in compliance with CPLR 3213. The notice demanded that any answer he served five days prior to return day.
On the return date, November 13, 1964, the parties did not submit any papers to the court and requested one week to do so. The Special Term granted this request. There was no oral argument. The summons, notice of motion and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . Pam.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Green v. Morningside Heights Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Kelso Co. v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Chernick v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Arthur v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- A. Alport & Son, Inc. v. Hotel Evans, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Filippazzo v. Garden State Brickface Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BorneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.