Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Roberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL, by the defendant, from a judgment entered on the a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Talcott, J.

This action was brought upon a promissory note for $200, dated December 16, 1868, made by the defendant, payable to William W. Williams, or bearer, and transferred to the' plaintiff. The action was commenced in 1870, and the complaint avers the note to have been payable on the first day of June, 1870. When the note was produced on the trial, it appeared that the year of payment was written in figures. And the case states that upon the production of the note a dispute arose, between the attorneys for the respective parties, as to the last figure of those expressing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  2. Jackson ex dem. Swain v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paul v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. GoodCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1901
  3. Chase v. SennCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API